The original Freelander arrived in 1997 as Land Rover's entry point. Affordable, capable enough for the school run and the weekend away, and properly British in the way that mattered to buyers who wanted the badge without the Discovery price tag. It sold over a million units across two generations before Land Rover quietly retired it in 2014 in favour of the Discovery Sport, a more profitable, more premium replacement on a newer platform.
Now it is coming back. Sort of.
The new Freelander is being developed by Chery Jaguar Land Rover, the joint venture between JLR and Chery Automobile that has been operating out of Changshu, China, since 2012. The car will sit on Chery's T1X platform, the same architecture that underpins the Jaecoo 7, the Omoda 5, and a range of other Chinese market SUVs from Chery's own expanding brand portfolio. It will be assembled at the Changshu plant. It is, for now, a China only product.
That last qualifier is doing a lot of work. "For now" and "China only" are phrases the automotive industry has used before, with consequences it did not fully anticipate.
What the T1X Platform Actually Is
The T1X is not a niche experimental architecture. As Carscoops reported, it is the foundational platform Chery uses across its most commercially important models in one of the world's most competitive markets. It handles electric and extended range electric powertrains. It was developed to Chinese specifications, tested in Chinese conditions, and optimised for Chinese buyers. It is a mature, well proven piece of engineering.
What it is not is a Land Rover platform. The underpinnings, the architecture that determines ride characteristics, crash behaviour, component sourcing, repairability, and the feel of the car under every driver input — none of that originated in Gaydon. The badge on the nose will be Land Rover. The bones of the car are Chery.
Chery is currently China's largest vehicle exporter, with sales outside mainland China accounting for 50 percent of its total volume. The company is not a small regional manufacturer that JLR is lending its name to in exchange for local market access. Chery assembles vehicles in Russia, has taken over a former Nissan factory in Barcelona, and is planning a stock market float that could value it at around $7 billion. It will further leverage its joint venture with Jaguar Land Rover as part of its next phase of international expansion.
That relationship, framed publicly as JLR accessing the Chinese market with Chery's help, looks considerably different from Chery's perspective. It is access to Land Rover's brand equity, its global customer relationships, and its century of accumulated heritage, in exchange for a platform and a factory. The question of who is helping whom deserves more scrutiny than it typically receives.
The Pattern Nobody Wants to Name
The Freelander is not an isolated case. The Chinese platform migration running through the Western car industry is systematic, and the Freelander simply makes it visible because the badge is familiar enough that people notice.
Audi announced a partnership with SAIC in July 2023, introducing EV platform technology from IM Motors, a SAIC brand, into future Audi electric models. Volkswagen, the parent company, is simultaneously developing what it calls the China Main Platform, built to Chinese specifications, for Chinese market products. Ford and Changan established a joint venture in September 2023, with Changan holding a 70 percent stake, to produce Ford vehicles based on Changan's electric vehicle technology. Changan's stake is not incidental. Ford holds 30 percent of a venture built on Chinese technology, producing Ford branded vehicles.
BMW and Great Wall Motor established Spotlight Automotive in 2020 with an investment of 5.1 billion yuan to produce the Mini brand EV using Great Wall Motor's technology. The Mini. The brand that defined British small car culture for six decades, now underpinned by a Chinese platform in a joint venture factory.
Renault has shipped more than 100,000 Dacia Spring models from its Dongfeng joint venture factory in Wuhan to Europe since 2023. Those are European market cars, sold at European dealerships, built on Chinese manufacturing capacity, sharing profits 50/50 with a Chinese partner. Volkswagen began exporting models from its FAW joint venture in Changchun to European markets in September 2025. These are not future plans. They are current commercial operations.
As automotive industry analyst Michael Dunne described in his November 2025 newsletter:
"Western brands are paying Chinese companies to manufacture their vehicles, giving away half the revenue, and creating a dependency that cannot be easily undone."
Dunne's assessment of the trajectory is stark. First, you partner with them. Then, you depend on them. Finally, they acquire you — or simply replace you. The evidence for each stage of that sequence is now visible across multiple brands simultaneously.
Like this? Get more MotorBuzz delivered to your browser. Click here to add MotorBuzz as a preferred news source on Google.
The Acquisition Track Record
The "finally, they acquire you" stage has already happened to some of the most recognisable names in motoring. Geely, the Chinese conglomerate headquartered in Hangzhou, owns Volvo, Polestar, Lotus, and a significant stake in Mercedes-Benz. MG, the brand that produced the MGB and the MGF and is remembered with genuine affection by a generation of British drivers, is owned by SAIC and is now China's most successful car export brand globally, selling over 60,000 vehicles in Mexico alone in 2024.
Geely holds stakes in Mercedes-Benz, Smart, Lotus, Aston Martin, Proton and Volvo Group, and has a broad partnership with Renault. Aston Martin. The brand carrying its eight bankruptcies and James Bond associations that MotorBuzz documented in detail recently, the one currently selling its F1 naming rights to stay solvent, has Geely as a significant shareholder. The creep is not theoretical. It has already arrived at some of the most emotionally significant addresses in automotive history.
The Commercial Logic Is Impeccable. The Cultural Consequences Are Not.
None of this is irrational from a boardroom perspective. Chinese platforms are mature, cost effective, and available immediately. Building a new architecture from scratch costs billions and takes five to seven years. JLR borrowing Chery's T1X gets the Freelander to market faster and cheaper than any alternative. In a period when JLR is managing its own financial pressures, that calculation is straightforward.
China exported 666,000 cars in a single month in late 2025, putting it on track to ship nearly 8 million vehicles for the full year, up from just one million in 2020. That eightfold increase in five years was enabled in large part by Western manufacturers who agreed to manufacture in Chinese joint ventures, split revenues 50/50 with Chinese partners, and in doing so, transferred production knowledge, supply chain relationships, and brand association to companies that are now their direct competitors.
The narrative sold to investors and the public was that China wins EVs while legacy automakers retain their advantage in traditional vehicles. That narrative is wrong. 78 percent of the 6.4 million vehicles China exported in 2024 were conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. China is not only winning electrification. It is dominating conventional manufacturing at the same time, using capacity built for and funded by Western joint ventures.
The Freelander being built on a Chery platform in Changshu is being sold as a smart piece of market strategy targeted at Chinese buyers who want an attainable Land Rover. And right now, it is only available in China. The line being held is that this arrangement stays in China.
History suggests that lines held only in official statements tend not to hold in practice. The Dacia Spring was only for China, until Renault shipped 100,000 of them to European customers. The Mini EV was a joint venture product, until it became the product. Ford's Chinese electric vehicles are a joint venture arrangement with Changan, until Ford needs affordable electric vehicles for markets that cannot sustain European development costs.
What Buyers Are Actually Paying For
When someone buys a Land Rover, they are paying for Gaydon. For British engineering, British testing, British manufacturing heritage and the specific kind of capability that those things represent. That is the premium. That is what the badge costs.
The new Freelander will carry that badge on a Chery platform, assembled in Changshu, with powertrains developed in China for the Chinese market. For Chinese buyers, that may be entirely acceptable. The question is what happens when, not if, the commercial logic of a cheaper platform and an existing factory makes the case for bringing it West.
At that point, the buyer pays for Gaydon and receives Changshu. The premium survives only as long as the distinction holds.
Land Rover is not the first brand to take this step, and it will not be the last. But it is probably the most visible one so far, precisely because the Freelander name carries enough history that people notice when what is underneath it changes.
The badge is British. The bones are not. That gap is only going to widen.